“The
teacher’s speech must always be vivid and alive and express his thoughts
exactly. If the speech is not cultured, this will remain in the future dancer’s
memory and will go on stage with him.” -Nikolai Tarasov, Technique for the Male Dancer, p.45, (1985)
Today I watched my students perform
in the Greater Victoria Performing Arts Festival. While listening to the adjudicators
give their feedback, it opened an opportunity for myself to think and reflect
upon an idea that I came across while reading Technique for the Male Dancer (N. Tarasov, 1985) where Tarasov
mentions that when working with different children, boys or girls, it is a good
idea for a young teacher to take speech lessons so that they know how to
appropriately communicate with children (students) of different ages. Today, I
felt I received a strong example of that thought.
While observing the adjudications,
I watched the guest adjudicator (who has excellent qualifications in my
opinion) ruin a potentially good adjudication because she didn’t convey her
thoughts with appropriate choice of words and the length of time it took her to
explain specific corrections. This adjudicator works a lot with university
level dance students, and it really showed when she was giving her
adjudications to much younger dancer students. She would speak to 8-year-old
dance students with words such as “articulate and impetus “. I realized that
none of the students could understand what she was saying to them and that they
would still just “smile and nod” rather than take initiative to ask for clarification
to the fact that they couldn’t understand what was being said to them. I also
realized that the adjudicator would speak to the students for extended periods
of time so that she lost most of the student’s attention because she didn’t or
couldn’t understand the level of concentration these students could maintain
relative to their ages.
After the performances and
adjudications were completed, I had the opportunity to speak with my students
in private. I asked them for their
thoughts on what the adjudicator had said. This is the feedback I received;
“How am I supposed to remember what she said? She talked so much I can’t
remember half the things she said!”
This was a good learning moment for me. It gave me strong reason to
reflect on my teaching methods, on when I have been invited to judge, and on adjudicating
competitions and festivals. Do I speak appropriately to my students when
teaching them? Do they understand what I demand of them? Do they have questions
that they would like to ask me, but my body language makes me not approachable?
These are just some of the questions that I have decided to ask myself about my
own mannerisms when I am in different situations where I need to express
different levels of communication.
Does anyone else have any similar experiences they would like to share?
Please comment below!